Contact
Boston
Providence
March 25, 2015
Avoiding Securities Fraud Prosecution: Using the SEC’s 2015 examination priorities as a compliance roadmap when dealing with retail investors.
The SEC annually provides registrants with a roadmap for avoiding securities fraud prosecution by identifying its examination priorities for that year. By proactively addressing these issues internally, registrants can stay one step ahead of the SEC and avoid potentially costly and damaging securities litigation.
Typically, one area on which the SEC tends to heavily focus its examination priorities is the protection of retail investors by ensuring financial professionals are fairly and transparently dispensing advice and selling securities. The SEC’s 2015 examination priorities are no exception. As the SEC acknowledges, registrants have begun to offer retail investors a broader and more complex range of investment products and services. A natural consequence of this is that some of these newly-offered products/services (e.g., private funds, illiquid investments, and structured products designed to generate higher yields in low-interest environments) will present risks that many retail investors have never previously seen.
As a result, among the SEC’s 2015 examination priorities are four initiatives aimed at protecting retail investors from the unique risks associated with these newly-offered products and services.
1. Protection of Retirement Assets
According to the SEC, investors are more dependent than ever before on their own personal investments for retirement. As a result, the financial services industry has begun offering a broader range of options to help individuals plan for, and live in their retirement years. To protect individual retirement investors, and to ensure they have the assets they need for retirement, the SEC has announced its intent to scrutinize registrants’ sales practices and recommendations related to retirement assets.
Sales Practices – The SEC will focus on assessing whether registrants are using improper or misleading practices when recommending the movement of retirement assets from employer-sponsored defined contribution plans to other investment vehicles. Registrants should update and review their disclosure policies to be sure they are clearly and thoroughly disclosing all risks associated with this type of recommendation. Registrants should also implement internal processes that encourage its agents to make these disclosures in writing whenever possible.
Suitability of Investment Recommendations – The SEC will also focus on examining whether registrants’ recommendations that retail investors invest retirement assets in complex or structured products and/or higher-yield securities are suitable. Registrants should be aware that the SEC will scrutinize any such recommendations, and they should be sure to conduct thorough due diligence of the investment vehicle, in particular any long-term or liquidity risks, before making such a recommendation. Registrants should also ensure their compliance departments confirm that any such recommendations are consistent with existing legal requirements.
2. Fairness of Fee Structures
The SEC has also announced its intent to focus on the increasing trend of financial professionals operating as dually-registered investment advisers/broker-dealers. In particular, in 2015 the SEC will be focusing on ensuring the fairness of the fees these dually-registered professional charge and the fee structures they employ.
Whereas broker-dealers typically charge investors a commission or mark-up on purchases and sales of securities, investment advisors—and, now, dually-registered investment advisors/broker-dealers—traditionally employ a much broader variety of fee structures. These fee structures may include charging clients: (i) hourly fees; (ii) fees based on the amount of assets under management; (iii) performance-based fees; or, (iv) “wrap” fees that encompass a bundle of financial services (e.g., investment advice, investment research, and brokerage services).
With the SEC focusing on the propriety of those and other non-commission fee structures, dually-registered professionals who offer multiple fee structures should be sure to recommend the fee structure that is in the best interest of the investor at the inception of the arrangement. Dually-registered professionals should also re-evaluate the selected fee structure on an ongoing basis to ensure that it remains the best and most efficient option for the investor as his/her investment priorities and portfolio develop over time. Given the SEC scrutiny on this issue, and the ease by which retail investors could become confused by the differences between the various fee structures, dually-registered professionals should carefully disclose all of the fee structure options to investors, in writing where possible, and should also discuss the benefits and detriments of each.
3. Transparency of “Alternative” Investments
One of the factors driving the trend of offering retail investors broader and more complex investment options is the increasing availability of so-called “alternative” investments, including investments that offer returns that are not correlated with the stock market. These types of investments have experienced rapid and significant growth compared to other categories, and this has resulted in stricter SEC attention in 2015.
Funds that offer “alternative” investments and “alternative” investment strategies should be aware that the SEC is placing them under a microscope. These funds should pay particularly close attention to:
Internal Practices and Policies – The SEC intends to focus on the leverage, liquidity, and valuation policies and practices funds employ with respect to “alternative” investments. Funds should proactively review those policies for completeness, and also take measures to ensure strict compliance with them.
Internal Controls – The SEC will also focus on the adequacy of funds’ internal controls. Funds should consult with their compliance departments and review all of their internal controls concerning staffing, funding, and empowerment of boards, compliance personnel, and back-offices. Funds should also, once again, take measure to ensure strict compliance with those internal controls.
Marketing – Lastly, the SEC will also focus on the manner by which funds market “alternative” investments to investors. Transparency with investors is the best policy, and funds are urged to err on the side of over-disclosure. Funds must be sure they are truthfully marketing “alternative” investments by clearly and thoroughly disclosing all potential risks, and should also document those disclosures in writing whenever possible.
4. Fixed Income Investment Companies
The SEC’s fourth 2015 examination priority that is aimed at protecting retail investors concerns fixed income investment companies. The SEC has observed that it is essentially a foregone conclusion that interest rates in the United States will rise at some point in the near future. In anticipation of this, the SEC plans to conduct a thorough review of mutual funds that have significant exposure to interest rate increases to ensure those funds’ retail investors are sufficiently protected from this eventuality.
Mutual fund and other investment companies that are particularly susceptible to interest rate increases should anticipate the SEC’s focus in 2015 and should implement appropriate compliance policies and procedures, as well as investment and trading controls that are sufficient to prevent misleading disclosures to investors. Additionally, these mutual fund and investment companies should also undertake thorough reviews of their investment and liquidity profiles to confirm that the profiles are consistent with all disclosures they are making to investors.
Sign up for email alerts
© 2024 | website: visual dialogue
News
Health Law
-
August 27, 2020
Best Lawyers in America® 2021 Recognizes Barrett & Singal Partners
-
June 03, 2020
Adelita Orefice, Esq. Honored by Rhode Island Monthly
-
April 17, 2020
| Michelle Peirce
Healthcare fraud warning from the Massachusetts U.S. Attorney arising out of COVID-19
-
April 10, 2020
| Elizabeth Foley
Financial Solutions for Small Businesses Disrupted by COVID-19
-
March 26, 2020
| Elizabeth Foley
Massachusetts and the Federal Government Expand Telemedicine Services and Coverage in Response to COVID-19
-
March 23, 2020
COVID-19 Update for Our Clients
-
March 23, 2020
Elizabeth Foley Uniquely Positioned to Help Employers with COVID-19 Employment Issues
-
August 27, 2019
Best Lawyers in America® 2020 Recognizes Barrett & Singal Partners
-
November 06, 2018
| Elizabeth Foley
Sweeping New Opioid Law Extends Anti-Kickback Liability to Private Insurance Market in Three Areas
-
November 05, 2018
Adelita Orefice Earns Certification in Healthcare Compliance
-
October 22, 2018
Super Lawyers® Recognizes Barrett & Singal Attorneys
-
September 18, 2018
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
DPH releases proposed amendments to Determination of Need regulation
-
August 20, 2018
| Robert Blaisdell
Governor Baker Signs Sweeping Reform on Employee non-Competition Agreements Law
-
August 15, 2018
Best Lawyers in America® recognizes four Barrett & Singal attorneys for their excellence in law.
-
June 13, 2018
| Michelle Peirce, David Chorney
Michelle Peirce and David Chorney Co-Host FBA Health Law Committee Panel
-
October 24, 2017
| Jeffrey Chase-Lubitz
Legal Issues and the Aging Physician
-
October 11, 2017
| Andrew Levine
Department of Public Health Presentation on DoN Regulations
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
July 20, 2017
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that terminating an employee for using medical marijuana may constitute handicap discrimination.
-
February 16, 2017
| Diane Moes
The ACA May Be in Jeopardy, but MACRA Isn’t Likely to Go Away
-
January 16, 2017
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom
DPH Adopts New Determination of Need Regulations
-
November 09, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
UPDATE: Preliminary Injunction Temporarily Halts Implementation of Final Rule Prohibiting Pre-Dispute Arbitration Contracts in LTC Facilities
-
October 24, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
UPDATE: Nursing Facilities Sue HHS to Block Ban on Pre-Dispute Binding Arbitration Agreements
-
October 17, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Adelita Orefice
HHS Prohibits Long-Term Care Facilities from Using Pre-Dispute Binding Arbitration Agreements
-
August 31, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Massachusetts Enacts Equal Pay Act: What employers can do now to prepare for its implementation
-
August 29, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom
Massachusetts Department of Public Health Announces Major Determination of Need Regulatory Reform Initiative
-
August 29, 2016
| Elizabeth Foley, Mikaela Taberner
New MA Prescription Monitoring Program Goes Live August 22, 2016
-
August 15, 2016
| Crystal Bloom, Amanda Beauregard
OPPS 2017 – Implementation of Section 603 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015
-
August 12, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell
CMS cracks down on “abuse” of nursing home residents via social media
-
July 20, 2016
| Kelly McGee, Adelita Orefice
Rhode Island Prohibits Physician Non-Competes
-
June 28, 2016
Massachusetts Trial Court Dismisses Wrongful Employment Termination Claim Based on Medical Marijuana Use
-
May 17, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Noncompliance with Security Deposit Law Could Be a Defense to Eviction
-
April 19, 2016
| Crystal Bloom
Update Regarding DPH Increased Oversight of Long-Term Care Facilities
-
April 11, 2016
| Crystal Bloom
DPH Strengthens Oversight of Long-Term Care Facilities
-
March 23, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Andrew Ferrer
Governor Baker Signs Legislation Designed To Address Opioid Crisis
-
March 23, 2016
| Kelly McGee
Phase 2 HIPAA Compliance Audits Set To Begin
-
March 22, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Failure to execute HIPAA business associate agreement and conduct risk analysis costs health system $1.55M
-
February 11, 2016
| Kelly McGee
Proposed Rule Modifies 42 CFR Part 2, the Confidentiality of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Patient Records Regulations
-
November 16, 2015
| Andrew Levine, Crystal Bloom, Nicole Sexton
Medicare Hospital Reimbursement Changes
-
October 26, 2015
Diane Moes named one of Mass Lawyers Weekly’s “Top Women of Law”
-
June 12, 2015
OIG Fraud Alert Warns Doctors That They Will Be Personally Accountable for Violations of Federal Anti-Kickback Statute
-
May 15, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Long Term Care Facility Regulatory Update
-
April 23, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Department of Public Health - new process for the addition of licensed mobile or portable health care units
-
April 21, 2015
| Paul Barrett, Jeffrey Chase-Lubitz
OIG Releases Compliance And Oversight Guide for Healthcare Boards
-
April 20, 2015
| Andrew Levine,
Massachusetts Department of Public Health Revamps Application Process for Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensaries
-
April 16, 2015
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
Proposed Legislation Will Increase Legal Authority of Health Policy Commission and Attorney General
-
March 15, 2015
| Andrew Levine
Health Policy Commission Releases Proposed Regulation Concerning Nurse-to-Patient Ratios | Public hearings scheduled for late March and early April
-
March 06, 2015
| Robert Blaisdell
Court Holds Officers and Directors of Non-Profit Healthcare Facility Personally Liable to Creditors for Breach of Fiduciary Duty
-
September 17, 2014
| Andrew Levine, Robert Blaisdell, Kathleen Harrell
Legal Issues Associated with MA Registered Marijuana Dispensaries: An article by Andrew Levine, Robert Blaisdell, and Kathleen Harrell
-
July 14, 2014
| Andrew Levine
Important Compounding Pharmacy Law Empowers Board of Registration in Pharmacy
-
June 20, 2014
| Crystal Bloom, Andrew Levine
Public Health Council Approves Amendments to Determination of Need Regulations
-
June 03, 2014
| Diane Moes
U.S. District Court Ruling Vacating HRSA’s 340B Program Orphan Drug Exclusion Rule Casts Uncertainty on Forthcoming "Mega-Rule"
-
May 28, 2014
| Andrew Levine
New Guidelines for Dementia Special Care Unit Regulations
-
January 10, 2014
| Andrew Levine
MassHealth Changes regulations to comply with Affordable Care Act
Litigation
-
October 02, 2020
Elizabeth McEvoy Returns to Three I's Research Integrity Conference to Lead Panel
-
August 27, 2020
Best Lawyers in America® 2021 Recognizes Barrett & Singal Partners
-
May 12, 2020
| Lauren Dwyer
First Federal Indictment Arising Out of Fraudulent Applications for Paycheck Protection Program Loans Highlights Focus on COVID-19 Related Investigations
-
March 05, 2020
Michelle Peirce Named President-Elect for Women's Bar Foundation
-
January 10, 2020
Barrett & Singal’s Elizabeth McEvoy Selected for WBA Women’s Leadership Initiative
-
April 30, 2020
| Elizabeth McEvoy
Impact of COVID-19 on Reporting Foreign Components
-
March 27, 2020
| Michelle Peirce
Scam Warning for Massachusetts Physicians
-
August 27, 2019
Best Lawyers in America® 2020 Recognizes Barrett & Singal Partners
-
December 08, 2018
CNN interviews Bruce Singal about the Mueller Investigation
-
October 22, 2018
Super Lawyers® Recognizes Barrett & Singal Attorneys
-
August 23, 2018
Bruce Singal explains the legal implications of Michael Cohen's plea and Paul Manafort's conviction on "Greater Boston"
-
August 15, 2018
Best Lawyers in America® recognizes four Barrett & Singal attorneys for their excellence in law.
-
August 09, 2018
Jim Braude Interviews Litigation Co-Chair Bruce Singal
-
June 13, 2018
| Michelle Peirce, David Chorney
Michelle Peirce and David Chorney Co-Host FBA Health Law Committee Panel
-
May 30, 2018
Bruce Singal discussed the Mueller Investigation on "Greater Boston"
-
May 10, 2018
Mass Lawyers Weekly Recognizes Elizabeth McEvoy
-
April 05, 2018
| Bruce Singal
In Russia probe, the difference between ‘target’ and ‘subject’ matters a great deal
-
February 22, 2018
Landmark Supreme Court Decision Substantially Narrows the Applicability of the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision
-
February 01, 2018
Michelle Peirce and Bruce Singal awarded Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly’s Lawyer of the Year award.
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
July 20, 2017
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court rules that terminating an employee for using medical marijuana may constitute handicap discrimination.
-
August 31, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell,
Massachusetts Enacts Equal Pay Act: What employers can do now to prepare for its implementation
-
August 12, 2016
| Robert Blaisdell
CMS cracks down on “abuse” of nursing home residents via social media
-
June 28, 2016
3 Things Every Massachusetts Podiatrist Should Know About the Proposed Amendments to Podiatry Regulations
-
June 01, 2016
How Recent Changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “White Collar” Exemptions May Affect Your Small Business
-
December 29, 2014
| Bruce Singal
Was the Ferguson grand jury rigged?
-
March 26, 2014
Employer Avoids Discrimination Trial Thanks to Robust Investigation and Documentation Policies
-
February 13, 2014
| Michelle Peirce
Shielding Companies Against Whistleblower Suits
-
March 01, 2010
Trials Facing Women Litigators and Tips For Success: Michelle Peirce
-
“Official Immunity” for Private Research Institutions: How a recent federal court decision impacts civil tort lawsuits arising out of research misconduct inquiries / investigations.
-
Research Misconduct Penalties and How to Avoid Them
Corporate
-
August 20, 2018
| Robert Blaisdell
Governor Baker Signs Sweeping Reform on Employee non-Competition Agreements Law
-
March 16, 2018
Massachusetts Equal Pay Act: 5 Things Every Employer Should Do Before It Takes Effect On July 1, 2018
-
August 22, 2017
Best Lawyers, Lawyers Weekly, and Superlawyers Recognize DBS Attorneys
-
June 28, 2016
Massachusetts Trial Court Dismisses Wrongful Employment Termination Claim Based on Medical Marijuana Use
-
June 28, 2016
3 Things Every Massachusetts Podiatrist Should Know About the Proposed Amendments to Podiatry Regulations
Research Misconduct
-
October 02, 2020
Elizabeth McEvoy Returns to Three I's Research Integrity Conference to Lead Panel
-
May 18, 2020
| Lauren Dwyer
Why Grantees Must be Prepared for Heightened Scrutiny of Conflicts of Interest in Foreign Support for US Research
-
January 10, 2020
Barrett & Singal’s Elizabeth McEvoy Selected for WBA Women’s Leadership Initiative
-
April 30, 2020
| Elizabeth McEvoy
Impact of COVID-19 on Reporting Foreign Components
-
April 22, 2019
| Elizabeth McEvoy
Elizabeth McEvoy Leads Panel at Three I’s Research Integrity Conference
-
February 01, 2018
Michelle Peirce and Bruce Singal awarded Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly’s Lawyer of the Year award.
-
March 23, 2016
| Andrew Levine, Andrew Ferrer
Governor Baker Signs Legislation Designed To Address Opioid Crisis
-
What is Research Misconduct and Why Should I Care?
-
“Official Immunity” for Private Research Institutions: How a recent federal court decision impacts civil tort lawsuits arising out of research misconduct inquiries / investigations.
-
Research Misconduct Penalties and How to Avoid Them
This website presents general information about Barrett & Singal and is not intended as legal advice nor should you consider it as such. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel.
Please note that contacting Barrett & Singal by email, telephone or facsimile will not establish an attorney-client relationship, obligate us to act as your attorney or impose an obligation on either the law firm or the receiving lawyer to keep the transmitted information confidential. Completion of Barrett & Singal’s new client intake protocol, including without limitation the firm’s conflicts checking process and an engagement letter, is necessary to establish an attorney-client relationship. Absent a current attorney-client relationship with Barrett & Singal, any information or documents communicated or transmitted by you to Barrett & Singal will not be treated as confidential, secret or protected in any way. If you are not a current client of Barrett & Singal, please do not send any confidential information to us through this web site or otherwise concerning any potential or actual legal matter you have. Before providing any confidential information to us, you must obtain permission to do so from one of the firm’s lawyers. By clicking "Accept," you acknowledge that we have no obligation to maintain the confidentiality of any information you submit to us unless we already represent you or unless we have agreed to receive limited confidential material/information from you as a prospective client.
If you would like to discuss becoming a client, please contact one of our attorneys to arrange for a meeting or telephone conference. If you wish to disclose confidential information to a lawyer in the firm before an attorney-client relationship is established, the protections that the law firm will provide to such information from a prospective client should be discussed with the firm attorney before such information is submitted. Thank you for your interest in Barrett & Singal.